Comparing Martin Luther King And Malcolm X - 917 Words

Brian Graichen - HST 325 - 06/17/2017 Q3: Compare and contrast Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were both civil rights leaders during the 1960s, but had different ideologies on how civil rights should be won. Both men were also deeply religious, but followed different religions and paths. The Great Depression never ended for African Americans; while others enjoyed an economic recovery, Black unemployment rose. Martin Luther King says that economic inequality in America became particularly obvious in 1963 (King, 23). Martin Luther King advocated nonviolent protest. By organizing sit-ins, protests, marches, and boycotts, Martin Luther King hoped to encourage African-Americans that by peacefully and†¦show more content†¦Malcolm X s speech shamed his audience in a way that made them want to fight for their right. Malcolm X s tone and mood seemed more aggressive and powerful in a forceful way. For example, then it is right for you and me to do whatever is necessary to defend our own people right here in this country (X et al, 306). Martin Luther King Jr. s tone and mood seemed more inspirational. MLK Jr was against violence and wanted a peaceful protest. For example, let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred (Howe). Malcolm X came from a home where he got little schooling and rose to greatness on his own intelligence and determination. Malcolm X attended West Junior High School, where he was the school s only black student. He excelled academically and was well liked by his classmates, who elected him class president, but later on he said that he felt that his classmates treated him more like a class pet than a human being (X et al, 28). His house was burned down by the Klu Klux Klan (KKK) and that resulted in the murder of his father his mother later had a nervous breakdown (X et al, 47). He would later move to Harlem and become a drug dealer. He was caught for burglary and jailed. In jail is where Malcolm X found Islam. He began following the teaching of El ijah Muhammad and found his way to stand up for African Americans. He believed that black people should defend themselves against any form ofShow MoreRelatedComparing Martin Luther King and Malcolm X Essay782 Words   |  4 PagesComparing Martin Luther King and Malcolm X Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are to diverse individuals with two opposite personalities but both successfully succeeded in achieving freedom and bringing equality to black Americans discriminated against for many years even after the abolishment of slavery. Martin Luther King was born in 1929, in Georgia, Atlanta. Unlike the other black people in the southern states he was different he grew up in well off family who wasRead MoreComparing the Beliefs of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X Essay1782 Words   |  8 PagesComparing the Beliefs of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X By April 1968, two of the worlds most remembered civil rights leaders, who fought for a difference in black America, had been assassinated. Despite their different beliefs and their different ways of promoting this message, they both had the same goal in mind; to promote black respect and pride. The visionary and angry voices of Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X together transformed theological thinking in Read MoreComparing The Life And Leadership Of Dr. Martin Luther King And Malcolm X1764 Words   |  8 Pageswhen a young pastor named Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. led the largest civil rights boycott against the Montgomery, Alabama bus system. Through his charisma and commitment, Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the strongest and influential civil rights activists. Nevertheless, he was not the only one in the fight for equality. A revolutionary by the name of Malcolm Little, later changing his name to Malcolm X, rose up and created the belief of Black Nationalism. Malcolm X believed in fighting the enemyRead More Some Lead, Some Follow, Others Change the World1114 Words   |  5 Pagesmost throughout this movement of change: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s form of protesting was the more effective than activist Malcolm X and was the reason for the majority of success during the Civil Rights movement. This is because Malcolm X’s cause would only slow progress during the movement, Martin Luther King Jr. had more authority, and he understood that peaceful protesting is the very genesis of redefining a nation. Malcolm X’s cause did not support any advancement inRead MoreMartin Luther King And King Remembered By Malcolm X Analysis804 Words   |  4 Pageswithout the help of notable activists Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X. Two bold and heroic men, one nonviolent and the other defiant. Yet, despite their different approaches to unjust acts each man made a similar difference. In the book King Remembered, authors Flip Schulke and Penelope O. McPhee quote King when he gracefully states, â€Å"If you want to say that I was a drum major, say that I was a drum major for justice; say that I was a drum major for peace†¦Ã¢â‚¬ . King stood righteously for nonviolenceRead MoreEssay on Mlk Malcom X Compare/Contrast1044 Words   |  5 PagesM.L.K and Malcolm X The two most influential civil rights activists in American history were Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. They supported equal rights for every race, but when comparing MLK’s â€Å"I Have a Dream’ and Malcolm X’s â€Å"The Ballot or the Bullet,† one sees the similarities in their rhetorical styles and differences in their tone and message. As seen in â€Å"I Have a Dream,† MLK has a more civilized and peaceful solution to the nation’s problems; whereas in X’s he has a will to do whateverRead MoreAfrican Americans And The Civil Rights Movement1260 Words   |  6 Pageswith hate and anger. The Civil Rights Movement is embodied in dramatic recorded speeches. Speeches like â€Å"I have A Dream†, the â€Å"Black Revolution†, and â€Å"Black Power’ and Coalition Politics. These speeches were written by great leaders. Martin Luther King Jr, Malcolm X, and Bayard Rusting were just some of the wise leaders of t he Civil Rights. However, these influential leaders had a different view on how things had to be done during the civil rights movement. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court declaresRead MoreRhetorical Analysis of Ballot or the Bullet Sppech by Malcolm X1359 Words   |  6 PagesAs one of the most proficient civil rights activist of the 1960s, Malcolm X and his speeches were very influential but particularly one speech was highly esteemed, that being the Ballot or the Bullet speech. A speech that was given after the I have A Dream speech by Dr. Martin Luther King. Despite, Dr. Martin Luther King being a pacifist and also a civil rights activist as well; Malcolm X was more tyrannical and advocated the use of violence. During this era, the democrats were in control of theRead MoreMartin and Malcolm Essay2150 Words   |  9 PagesAlthough Martin Luther King and Malcolm X both provided exceptional leadership during the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s, both took different paths in fighting for African American rights. The two, separately, were the defining figures of the 1960s black freedom struggle. On one side, you had a comfortable middle-class family southern Baptist: King, who advocated nonviolence learned through the studying of Gandhi juxtaposed with X, advocating social awareness who learned by experiencing injusticeRead MoreThe Civil Rights Movement Of The 1950s And 1960s1183 Words   |  5 Pageswill discuss social challenges in the 1950s and 1960s to the discriminative laws and the legal impact these challenges had on African-Americans at the time. In the 1950s and 1960s, leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X galvanised both black and white Americans to fight for equal rights. King, described by Anthony Badger as ‘indispensable’ to the Civil Rights movement, was one of the leaders in the 1963 Birmingham Campaign. This campaign protested segregation laws in the city, and the

A Great Law of Human Action Free Essays

Truong Th? H? ng Nhung MSV: 08D170334 *** Managers can find an effective way to delegate work successfully thanks to reading the chapter Tom Sawyer whitewashing the fence in the famous novel of â€Å"Tom Sawyer†, written by Mark Twain because Tom Sawyer discovered a great law of human action, without knowing it – namely, that in order to make a man or a boy covet a thing, it is only necessary to make the thing difficult to attain. When being assigned to paint the fence, Tom felt â€Å"life to him seemed hollow, and existence but a burden†. Tom wanted to hire some children walking on the street to do his work but he found that he didn’t have enough money to buy their â€Å"free afternoon†. We will write a custom essay sample on A Great Law of Human Action or any similar topic only for you Order Now At this dark and hopeless moment, a magnificent idea raised in his mind, instead of complaining, he returned to his work with pleasure. Soon came a boy, named Ben Rogers by and laughed at Tom because he could not go swimming instead he had to work. Tom pretended to be so interested in his work, which made Ben curious to try the work. â€Å"It suits Tom Sawyer†, â€Å"I reckon there ain’t one boy in a thousand, maybe two thousand, that can do it the way it’s got to be done†, these sayings urged Ben to ask for whitewashing the fence a bit. Tom surrendered reluctantly his brush to Ben in exchange for an apple core. Gradually, more and more boys came to whitewash the fence with Ben, the duty of Tom was just sitting under a shade tree, managing the activity. In such a short time, the fence put on â€Å"a new shirt† with the pleasure of both Tom and the children. From the story, we can withdraw two useful delegation skill. First, you need to know how to make your task inviting. No one wants to take a task which you are always grumbling about it. Tom would never have invited the children to take his work if he had been always complaining about the boreness of the work. Second, when someone asks to help you with your work, you should pretend to hold back, as Tom did, but do allow them to help you in the end. If so, he will find that it’s not easy to take the job, and so appreciate it more highly. Last, but not least, you need to monitor the one to whom you delegated the job. In the whole, the great law of human action really reflects the fact about all people’s need. People always want to show that they have abilities to fulfill a difficult task which many people are unable to do. How to cite A Great Law of Human Action, Essays

Master narrative free essay sample

Life is a history of master narratives, controlling the views of many individuals. The definition of master narrative can seem quite vague, but the values and limitations it holds give it purpose in the world. Whether or not the purpose of a master narrative is acknowledged varies between each person. Master narratives are not always right or wrong— true or false, good or bad— they are a way to marginalize society into thinking a certain way. Master Narratives always have and always will shape the beliefs and knowledge of the world by defining and defying society’s thoughts, emotions, and actions through the stereotypical views of our world. Master narrative is a concept that describes the overall ‘story’ of an event or occurrence. They are the base where all other stories branch out of, and conduct the way different ideological groups think, feel, act and what they believe in. I describe master narratives as being vague because within different ideological groups, the same concept could portray a very different outlook, resulting in a completely different master narrative on the same or similar topic. Master narratives within ideological groups are not considered vague because the concept is something everyone in that specific group knows about and usually agrees upon. What is not clearly defined, is the whole definition of what master narratives ‘could be’ in all other ideological groups, races, regions, religions, cultures, sexes, etc. If a person is based in a certain group, for example: females, African Americans, Canadians, elderly, teenagers†¦ it does not mean they have to believe everything or agree with the ‘master narratives’ that go along with the stereotypical consensus of those groups. As Robert Fulford describes in his article on master narrative, â€Å"they [master narratives] are often wrong in significant ways,† they are overgeneralized, distorted, and belittling (31). Postmodernism comes into play when the realization that a single persons truths or beliefs may be vastly different from anyone else’s. The point of postmodernism is not to search for the truth, but to understand the concept that everyone has their own perception of these truths. Master narratives and postmodernism go hand-in-hand as there is no absolute truth that every person on Earth abides to, therefore there are thousands of different master narratives. A master narrative of Western civilization—2014 edition—would be: every person is equally valued. This statement is true now, but up until the early 20th Century the master narrative was that the ‘white man ruled. ’ Women had no independence, ‘Blacks’ were slaves, and Native Americans lost their land; mass amounts of discrimination determined what these people could do, where they could go, how they were treated and how much money they made. Not until the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did the master narrative based upon these groups of people begin to change. Yet today, in different areas of the world they may still follow or believe in a similar master narrative as Western civilization used to. Master narratives provide an overall feeling of what is, or is not, acceptable based on the ideologies of a larger group of individuals. Master narratives have rules and regulations that determine how they are constructed and why they shape the world. In order to understand master narratives there needs to be limitations, which provide structure and values, guiding the morals of the world—which are not always good— along with a sense of history and storytelling. The limits that construct master narratives rely on facts and order; they have an expiry date, are not very descriptive, are able to alternate, and provide the basic framework of the event or story. Master narratives cannot be only one person’s idea, concept, belief, or life story. They are the overall ‘thoughts’ of society, from which individual ideas and beliefs branch out from. Master narratives provide society with bases of knowledge and a guideline for conducting daily life. Historical events, thoughts on society or religion, what we think is good or bad, right or wrong, all have to do with master narratives. If there were not master narratives like: The Bible, Slavery, Abortion†¦telling society what to believe in or think is right or wrong, people would not know about them or their importance. Master narratives do not always have respectable connotations. For instance, the consumption of marijuana used to have a lingering master narrative that â€Å"linked the use of marijuana with violence, crime and other socially deviant behaviors, primarily committed by ‘racially inferior’ or underclass communities† according to the â€Å"Marijuana Timeline† on PBS. org. Today marijuana is legal for medical use in nine different states across America, with two of these states including regulations for recreational use. Society lets master narratives judge whole groups of people based on the incidents of a few individuals which is very stereotypical. However, the master narrative does not have the control or ability to determine every person’s actions. A master narrative that resonates with me is the view American’s have on Canadians- that they are over polite and always say ‘sorry’ even when it is not their fault. I would think being very polite is one of the best qualities Canadians have, yet Americans make fun of us for it or think we are ignorant because of it. I hear this master narrative all over the place, whether it is on the internet, TV, or from friends. It is not that I completely disagree with this statement, but I think it is a very stereotypical view on Canadians. This master narrative is also extremely vague as I have met many Canadians who are rude and arrogant, and who certainly are not polite to all those they interact with. Additionally, I have traveled to Mexico and found that people there are generally more pleasant and kind than a vast majority of people I have met in Canada. In conclusion, the concept of master narrative is to marginalize society’s thoughts, feelings, and actions by inducing values and limitations for humanity to follow and believe in. With this being said, master narratives hold a purpose in the way society conducts their lives but it also produces an immensely stereotypical view on certain subjects and it is the decision of each individual whether or not they wish to follow the ‘master narratives’ of the world.